The topic of the e-mail that we received, which has since been reprinted in the local media, was on ethics reform in local governments. Our first reaction was one of laughter, but as the discussion wore on, changed to a more serious tone. As we look back through many of our own posts, we realized we were talking about ethical issues. Threats from school board members, threats to cut public safety over a tax cut, hand-picked charter review committees designed to further a governmental agenda, shady campaign contributions, and the list goes on. We had to ask ourselves if ethics might not really be the big issue on our local level?
Not long after that our un-news site received approval from blogger.com and we got back to writing, forgetting about the conversations we had in the previous days when we could not post more luring comments from our favorite school board member grabbed our attention. Then, towards the end of the week, the e-mails started pouring in on two issues. One was the resurgence of the 'Preserve' housing project that had found new life because of more lies told to the state to manipulate them into circumventing the will of our local residents. The other was the gift Mayor Swan was trying to bring to the general fund of the City of Kissimmee from the coffers of KUA with out ever discussing the topic with other commissioners. At least as far as we know, there were no discussions between commissioners. Both of these issues are breaches of public trust. Both of these issues require an investigation or audit into possible 'ethics' violations. Our shock over these two incidents set off a flurry of discussion at WayneWho HQ, and then we remembered the letter.
Ethics are that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions. This is a high level concept when you look at our local political playing field, and an idea that is usually buried as a childish understanding of politics. It is often noted between politicians and the special interests groups that control them that those who speak of ethics don't have the experience to get things done for their constituents. Voters are told this same message and that it is who a candidate knows that improves their electability. Maybe ethics and electability should be more closely tied to a candidate than contributions and electability. Our maybe it is just a fools dream to believe our system is capable of operating on this level.
While this is probably not the glowing review the Harrell campaign was hoping for, we would remind all candidates that we do not endorse candidates. We may endorse issues held by candidates, including those who are already sitting in elected positions, but we will leave the endorsement of candidates to the local media and remote bloggers who would rather apply their California values litmus test to qualifying potential candidates. We hope that ethics becomes a discussion topic during this election cycle. We hope that it every candidate will stand up and state their intentions for ethics reform as well as the issue being discussed by the Osceola News Gazette, campaign finance reform. We would also like to challenge all of the candidates to do more than just talk about these issues. Writing a letter is a good start, but we believe that actions speak louder than words. What are you going to do is the question that must be answered next.
7 comments:
His letter in St. Cloud in the news was even better than the one he had in the gazette. Hit hit all the other candidates in that race who were writing letters with titles like 'My Perspective' and 'A New Perspective'. His had the title of 'Insert Catchy Title Here.' It was great!
I am disappointed in Wayne Who. You should be seriously discussing endorsements for Simi Valley, CA.
I hope that you have more to say on the KUA issue. That is a bunch of bull! Just ask those who were in the audience who had no idea Jim and Jim were going to cut the employees throats. Already have the Police and Fire Departments angry, might as well add in KUA as well!
If you are a candidate you should not be allowed to vote on any project for any individual or corporation if you have taken campaign funds from that individual or entity. It is as simple as that. If you get campaign money you have to abstain.
I agree with the folks above. I live in St. Cloud and Harrell is all the buzz. What an oustanding/upstanding person. He will be a welcomed addittion to the county for our district and I believe he will do more than just talk about issues and write letters. Hawkins and Lane are the same candidate and Robertson is just crazy.
I am so glad Chuck Dunnick will run again. Now we have someone in the race we can be proud of.
Chuck Dunnick has one heck of a track record, and I can't wait for him to be commissioner again. He has done so much for this county. Hes absolutly has my vote!!
Post a Comment