Wednesday, July 2, 2008

City of Kissimmee Candidate Social

Today is the first candidate social put on by the Kissimmee Chamber of Commerce. Today's gathering will focus on the City of Kissimmee candidates who will be asked a series of media driven questions from our local celebrity media personalities on what they believe are important issues to the community. Our recommendation is to skip the event and catch this one on your favorite government access channel, Access Osceola. What you will save on the cost of admission and the roll of Tums you will need after eating another rubber chicken dinner will justify the expense of the converter box to get channel 199. That is of course if you have not already wisely cut your cable package. If you have cut your cable package, then we recommend you still save your money and don't waste time on this social event.

The real problem with this event is that the "questions" asked by the celebrity interviewers are typically open ended generic "questions" that have nothing to do with the struggles our citizens face every day. The "questions" rarely give insight into the true knowledge and depth of a candidate. The "questions" also drive an agenda that is many times at odds with what the community has in mind. Questions on economic development are almost always asked as if there was some magic pot of money in which to draw from. And when candidates give the same old tired answer of "I think we should revitalize downtown and it would be nice if their was some night life down there," the celebrity interviewers nod their collective heads without ever asking the follow up of "Why?", "How do you intend to pay for it?", or the question that should be asked, "What are you going to cut to pay for this?" Incumbent candidates will tout their experience and the people that they know as reasons for the citizens to re-elect them and again the celebrity interviewer will not make them expand on these answers. "Is a round-about fountain paid for with gas tax money a wise decision when the city commission keeps cutting funding for public transportation?", "Is it wise to make commissioner backed changes to the City Charter with limited public input, and then table changes made by the actual charter review committee?", and "Since we now have a strong Mayor form of government, do we still need to employ the city manager?" Local governments have not had a great track record over the past couple of years, but this will not factor into the questioning because it is not proper to discuss failure at a social event.

Our advice to the voters is to call the candidates and talk to them yourself. Ask them about the questions that are important to you. If they blow off your questions then, you know what they are going to do if they are elected. Social events, like these forums, are not designed for the public, but one on one you will get a better idea of what a candidate is all about.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

why don't you post all the candidates phone numbers?

Anonymous said...

Maybe someone should ask the question to Mr. Gemskie on who he is referring to when he says 'Those People'?

GRAFFIX said...

GOOD COLUMN. YOU ARE CORRECT IN THAT THE QUESTIONS ARE THE SAME AND INEVITABLY THE QUESTIONS ARISES "IF ELECTED, WILL YOU FIRE MARK DURBIN"? WHEN I RAN AGAINST GEMSKIE, I USED NO NOTES, BUT NOTICED HE HAD EVERY QUESTION ASKED IN FRONT OF HIM WITH HIS REHEARSED ANSWER. HOW DID HE GET THE QUESTIONS IN ADVANCE? ALL THE CANDIDATES HAD PREPARED OPENING AND SUPRISINGLY, A PREPARED CLOSING. THEY WERE ROBOTIC, BUT APPARENTLY, THE PUBLIC LIKES PUPPETS. GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CHOICES.

Anonymous said...

How about instead of the same peole adking the questions, we have the audience ask them.
What's better than a town hall debate. The chamber can still host it.

Anonymous said...

How dare the Chamber put on a so called debate, they should be ashamed. What a waste of time. Why would anyone want to see competing candidates answer questions from the local media. We all know questions should only come from anonymous blogs.

Clearly the media gives the questions they are going to ask to the candidates they like. Who could predict questions about economic development, taxes, crime and staffing. What will our out of touch media think of next?

I can’t believe that some candidates have the gall to actually prepare their remarks and answers to potential questions. We need more candidates like Wayne Evens who is always accurate without the need for preparation. There is too much planning done by elected official. More decisions should be made off the cuff.

Stay away from events where you hear directly from the candidates if no one attends maybe they will stop conducting these farcical social activities. Never read the newspapers they are out of touch with what real people want.

Only anonymous blogs can give you the unbiased truth. Keep up the great work Wayne Who!

Anonymous said...

I attended the event. The food was not worth the $20 (but I will digress)...

Of all the candidates, I was most impressed with Jorge Miranda.

He was basically the only one that really expressed his opinions and expressed his frustrations over how the City had been run over the last four years!

The others basically agreed on everything.

The best part came at the end when Mayor Swan stated he did not know there was even a policy on speaking Spanish in the workplace and Miranda in his closing statement stated that if elected Mayor he would know the Cities policies.

My vote after the debate? Gail Eck (Seat 1), Jamie Matos (Seat 3) and Jorge Miranda (Mayor).

We truly need fresh ideas and minds in the City Commission.

Anonymous said...

Gail is a nice lady, but she has no idea about what her job would be as a commissioner. We do not need another staff freindly face on the commission. We need someone who will ask hard questions and hold staff accountable. That is not Gail.

Anonymous said...

Commission cell phone numbers:

Gemskie- 407-433-0188
Grieb- 407-922-2000
Irizarry- 321-443-4946
Swan- 407-973-5226
Van Meter- 407-973-5186

Call them. They answer.