The WayneWho staff decided we would take a cue from the Kissimmee City Commission and take a week off because there was nothing really "critical" going on in the community, and it was great. Some great fishing around Horseshoe Bend on the beautiful Lake of the Ozarks is a great way to reset the normality meter and bring our local issues back into focus. Or so we thought.
On our return we discovered that in our time off, we had been innondated with e-mails on what we thought of the debates that had recently been held for the City of Kissimmee, and Osceola County District 3 races. It seems that our input was being sought on an issue that we are not very well versed on, candidates. As our long time readers know, we focus on government policy, process, and the elected officials who week in and week out provide endless amounts of entertainment as they attempt to make decisions on policies and processes they only understand when given the "back-up" that explains how they should vote. We do not normally address candidates unless their policy views or comprimised pasts deserve some type of discussion. We also believe that as an "un-news" source, it would be absurd to offer endorsements, even if we could offer more reasoned thoughts than our local media counterparts. But we thought we would try to get a copy of the debates of Access Osceola and give it a try.
We watched the debates and we only have a couple of thoughts. Our first thought is that we are all doomed. The level of knowledge of the majority of candidates, including incumbants, is almost non-existant. Not that the questions asked by our local media really tested that knowledge, but most of the candidates stumbled on tough questions like "Would you consider organizational changes in city government?" and on the county side "How will your Democratic values effect your judgement on the commission?" Glad our media friends put some thought into their questions. Maybe someone should ask a question like "Do you understand what purgury means Mr. Ferentinos?" or "Do you actually plan on passing an ordinance that states 'We have gotta do something' Mr. Miranda? While we understand it is difficult for someone who has not served in an elected seat to formulate policy, some of those running have been doing so for so long that they should be considered incumbants themselves.
To be fair we would have to say that there were a few moments that stood out to us as great moments, like John Bykowski's call for a citizens review panel for the city budget, Jeane Van Meter's call for log in sheets to track special interest groups and lobbiest who frequent commissioners offices at the county, and Tony Ferentinos' declaration that the county budget has no accountablility (which the rest of the candidates in one way or another agreed with), these moments were exceptions to the rule. These moments at least gave us hope that this year's elections would give us candidates that might start to understand the basics of their job titles. But then comments like "It takes three votes to get anything done" from Jeanne Van Meter reminds us what happens once a candidate gets elected.
We will save any knods and/or winner declerations to our other blogging coutner parts. We will stick with our own brand of un-news and poltical satire.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Maybe another question should be Mr. McKinnon how does it feel to break he Sunshine Law and get away with it. How does it feel to go Bankrupt Mrs. Van Meter and you know how to run what?
This list can go on forever. Wayne Who you really screwed this time. People asked you your opinion on the District 3 debate, not to bash the candidates. Besides get your facts straight next time.
I started reading this column cheering out loud for your stance on not "endorsing" a candidate. However I kept reading the article and was sadly disappointed to see you went ahead and attempted to do so.
I like whoiswayne covering current affairs in government not would be affairs and gossip
I think it is great that you are not out their picking sides. I think the other commenters have valid points about the other candidates, but that is for those people to explain. I think it is great that you pointed out ideas that you thought were good because I think that is more important that pointing out the gossipy junk.
That's exactly what it is,junk.
Wayne, you need to bring yourself forward face to face and ask all these candidates. Give them a chance to explain instead of your horrible accusations and mudslinging.
Mudslinging from WayneWho?? The commenters are the ones doing that. You guys just wanted to hear WayneWho talk about how great Tony was at the debate, and WayneWho raised valid questions about his honesty and you guys don't like it. Maybe it is the court system that is doing the mudslinging:
STATE OF FLORIDA vs. ANTHONY E FERENTINOS - SOLICATION TO PERJURY
STATE OF FLORIDA vs. ANTHONY E FERENTINOS - THEFT OF STATE FUNDS
THE COURT HAS GRANTED A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL COUNT ONE.
*************CASE CLOSED*************************
12/02/02 STATE FILED A NOLLE PROSEQUI IN OPEN COURT BA1202
12/02/02 Nolle Prosequi: BA1202
FILED IN OPEN COURT, ALL COUNTS
To the anonymous person who wrote the above about Anthony Ferentinos and State Funds. Apparently sir or madam you have no reading skills. Next time before you author something read it carefully. If you would have looked past your nose, you would have seen the aquital. You and Waywho are the musdslingers. It's a shame that Wayne who didn't look into this before it was posted on the blog. Mis information again.
Wayne evans loves to slam other candidates and their legal pasts whether valid or not. He can't take someone saying anything bad though about his Greek God
He'll bend over backwards to help you.
Sounds like a racists comment to me.
Post a Comment